欢迎进入WEAP网站
WEAP
WEAP的首创和发起者 Stockholm Environment Institute.


关于WEAP

主页
为何选择WEAP?
WEAP模型简介
模型更新
屏幕举例
动画演示
模型应用
相关发表
模型发展及致谢

应用WEAP
下载
用户许可
用户指南
迅捷教程
视频资料
模型资源

用户论坛
发起讨论
会员列表
文本编辑

更多支持
模型训练
课堂讲授
广泛合作

关于我们
SEI-US 水资源论坛
联系我们

 环境新闻
LEAP 能源规划?
认识LEAP: SEI的能源规划软件

用户论坛

所有的话题 | 话题 "Runoff Resistance Factor (rrf) And Manning's N"
登录以发布新的消息或回复现有消息
 
作者 消息
Patrick Keys

主题: Runoff Resistance Factor (rrf) And Manning's N   
公布: 4/6/2010 审阅的: 11923 times
Hi,

Does anyone know of a relationship between the Runoff Resistance Factor (RRF) and the surface roughness coefficient, Manning's N? I am trying to estimate the RRF of a landcover dataset, and it would be handy to have a conversion factor or coefficient by which to multiply standardized roughness values to find RRF.

If not, maybe this is a niche for some research?

Thanks,
Pat
Glenn Moeller

主题: Re: Runoff Resistance Factor (rrf) And Manning's N   
公布: 4/19/2010 审阅的: 11856 times
Hi Patrick,

RRF (formerly Leaf Area Index, LAI) is more akin to C in the rational formula than to Manning's N. Increasing RRF causes a decrease in surface runoff (since Z1 is less than 1 and surface runoff of proportional to Z1 raised to the RRF) with a consequent increase in Z1. This of course leads to higher interflow, Z2 (or flow to GW), baseflow, and ET. I'm not sure how you're trying to use N in WEAP, but I do not believe this is the way to do it. I'm not actually sure it can be done at all.

Hope this helps,
Glenn
Gonzalo Cortes

主题: Re: Runoff Resistance Factor (rrf) And Manning's N   
公布: 5/5/2010 审阅的: 11805 times
Hi Patrick, I think it should be a mistake associating N in any way with WEAP. Manning's n is more of an "hydraulic" property of a channel, and it should be considered only if you're interested in properties of the water flow inside the channel, such as speed and height of the flow. As WEAP21 doesn't compute or use this values, Manning's N should be of no importance in our data.


话题 "Runoff Resistance Factor (rrf) And Manning's N"